Fear, Manipulation, and the ADL

August 7th, 2005


Ernst Zundel, the most prominent contemporary Holocaust denier, was recently extradited to Germany, where he will likely be indicted on fourteen counts of hate crimes.  Zundel was arrested solely for his speech, which is more stringently regulated in Germany than in the U.S. and many European nations.  Germany should be censured by civil libertarians for its policies on free speech, as should all groups that advocate similar repression.  Suppression, bullying, and surveillance do not stop the problem of intolerance.  These tactics inevitably do more harm than good.

“Suppression, Bullying, and Surveillance” aren’t just tactics; it is also the motto of the Anti-Defamation League (ADL), which, for years, has helped alert the public to Zundel’s despicable work.  It is true that the ADL does an unparalleled job of identifying hate groups, cataloguing hate crimes, and highlighting dangerous rhetoric.  However, the ADL does not just expose hate speech, but also tries to censor it and relentlessly spies on “suspicious” organizations, collecting license plate numbers and other personal information at events like Arab community meetings for their Ashcroftesque files, among other dubious activities.  The ADL also intimidates through smear campaigns and has repeatedly (and successfully) been sued for libel by people recklessly accused of anti-Semitism.  

Such practices extend to the realm of paranoia and can only be justified through inflated fears and trumped up threats.  In a recent survey, the ADL sounded the alarm of anti-Semitism, claiming that 14% of Americans are “unquestionably anti-Semitic.”  The ADL prints some of the questions, but does not divulge the formula used to establish “unquestionable” anti-Semitism.  One question found that 33% “of Americans believe Jews are more loyal to Israel than America.”  Does this really make those 33% anti-Semitic?  Such an abstract question is completely meaningless.  Many Jews feel a deep spiritual connection with Israel – how does one measure that in terms of “loyalty?”  Last year, over a quarter of the Jews in Florida came out to vote for Bush, far more than in 2000.  Bush’s hawkish foreign policies in Arab nations are celebrated by right-wing Jews and Israelis.  The change in Jewish support since the invasion of Iraq is a reflection of how important Israel – and loyalty to Israel – is for many American Jews.    

The survey then happily states that “a majority of Americans favors measures that would support and teach tolerance and support diverse student bodies.”  The first supporting statistic is, “50% agree to stopping racist and anti-Semitic groups from using the Internet.”  How is denying free speech on the Internet equivalent to supporting tolerance and diversity?  Equating anti-censorship to anti-Semitism is incongruous and absurd, especially given the ADL’s rather suspect definition of “anti-Semitism.”   

The ADL is a giant, both in resources and influence, and criticism of the organization in the mainstream media is rare[1].  As a result, the ADL’s credibility remains unquestioned and the threat of anti-Semitism in America becomes overstated.  By all accounts, anti-Semitism in the U.S. has continually been on the decrease.  And yet, according to a Slate.com article, 60% of American Jews view anti-Semitism as the greatest threat to American Jews.  This figure is completely divorced from reality (remember, a Jew was popularly chosen as vice-President in 2000) and is the result the hyperbole of groups like the ADL. 

The anxiety caused by the fear-mongering ADL and others have deterred many Jews from dedicating attention to pressing issues.  Jewish publications and organizations, particularly those involving youth, are dominated by identity rhetoric about the “Jewish experience” or “finding one’s voice” or a college student’s “first encounter with anti-Semitism,” which is often something akin to someone else telling him that “he doesn’t look Jewish.”  Instead of political dissent and protest (a vibrant aspect of the Jewish tradition), pens are too often committed to introspection and personal narrative.  Let’s keep things in perspective here.  We live in a racist country.  Blacks, Arab-Americans, gays, and other truly marginalized groups probably wish they encountered the types of “intolerance” that many young Jews write about.  In Florida, a study found that 80% of drivers who were stopped by police were black or Hispanic, even though those two groups compose just over 5% of the population.  There are countless similar statistics, from police brutality to prison population to schooling disparity, that paint a picture of the true, devastating intolerance and racism in America.   

The parochial views of so many Jewish groups is only narrowed when someone like Zundel is locked away and silenced and when the truth is not allowed to emerge through debate and discourse.  Authoritarian tactics and inflated fears further repress that discourse and have denied attention, particularly from young Jews, to those who are truly oppressed and do not have a voice.  Groups like the ADL may amplify the Jewish voice, but they also cheapen what is being said and diminish those who might be listening.   


 

[1] One notable exception is William Safire’s piece in 2001 calling for the resignation of Director Abraham Foxman due to his “ethical blindness” in his involvement with Clinton’s pardon of ADL supporter Marc Rich.  

 


© 2004 Aaron Sussman. All rights reserved.

BACK