Smashing the Fourth Estate, or Reporting with the Enemy

 


The sweat beaded on Al Sharpton’s forehead as he angrily and passionately delivered his message at the “March for Peace, Justice, and Democracy” on April 29th in New York City: “This war is illegal; it is immoral, and it is un-American….We have a President who misled the American people….This President – who can see weapons of mass destruction in Iraq that are not there, but cannot see a hurricane in New Orleans that is there….We are the picture of the American people….”  By the time he was finished, I was fired up, unable to resist a loud response of “Whoo!” and “Yeah!”  My need to speak truth to power was frowned upon by the professional looking men and women surrounding me, all of whom immediately looked at the “Press Badge” I was given by United for Peace and Justice (UFPJ).   Apparently, members of “The Press” don’t cheer for the speakers at a press conference, as I learned from the icy gaze of the Newsday guy and the Univision woman.  Though their New York City issued credentials looked a little more professional than mine (which proudly had “WESU [A Crowded Fire] printed on it), we were all given the same access, and I elbowed my way in to get the scoop, even though it was often unnecessary to do so.

I had attended many demonstrations before, but this was my first as a member of “The Press.”   There was, however, a downside to my journalistic status – in addition to receiving condescending glares at the press conference, I was kicked out of the main body of the march, even though I was close enough to touch the back of Jesse Jackson’s neck, or pat Daniel Ellsberg on the shoulder, or smell Susan Sarandon’s hair.  I was told to walk in front of the march with the real, professional, important journalists, closely following a man from 1010WINS radio, assuming he knew where the action was.  This quest took me into a nearby Starbucks.  After I caught up with what I will call the Journalism-Experience-Required Committee (JERC), I began surveying the crowd of about 350,000 for people to talk to. 

            The range of people in the march was as diverse as the spectrum of people around the nation who are furious and disheartened by this war and this administration.  Some of the most influential organizations in the country joined with UFPJ to organize the protest:  the RainbowPUSH Coalition, National Organization for Women, People’s Hurricane Relief Fund, US Labor Against the War (more unions were represented at the protest than at any previous demonstration), and many others.  The timing of the march embodied a grave urgency: April 29th marked both the end of the bloodiest month in Iraq in half a year and the beginning of threatened aggression against Iran.  That urgency could be heard in the voices of everyone I spoke to.

            Ruth Garbus is a member of the Women’s League for Freedom and Justice and is a close friend of Daniel Ellsberg, the heroic whistleblower who once faced 115 years in prison for leaking what would come to be known as the Pentagon Papers during the Vietnam War.  Ruth echoed Ellsberg’s call for current officials to leak information and prevent a devastating attack on Iran:  “The plans for Iran have already been made.  Troops are ready; it’s all strategically planned – and we must prevent a continuation of this war.” 

            Fear over what is going to happen in the imminent future resonated with many.  Max, from Germany, told me he came to the march to “say no” to aggression in Iran and to protest the proliferation of nuclear weapons, something he sees as a major threat to peace.  He was one of many protesters with a “no nukes” message – a cause that becomes all the more terrifying when you read the words of former Clinton Defense Secretary, William Perry, who says that "there is a greater than 50 per cent probability of a nuclear strike on US targets within a decade."

            The mood of the protest is impossible to characterize: it could shift in a moment from feeling like a carnival to feeling like a funeral.  When Cindy Sheehan, who is the leading figure in galvanizing the anti-war movement and the mother of Casey, one of the 2,422 American soldiers killed in Iraq, spoke about the “war criminals” in the government and the “war machine,” her words were fiery, if also familiar and rehearsed.  But then she paused for a moment to tell us that the other night, she dreamt about her son as a toddler, asking if he can go out and play.  You look around and you see mothers and fathers with pictures of their children who did not make it out of Iraq; you see the faces of fatherless or motherless children attending the protest with their one heartbroken parent.  You realize just how real it all is and you feel the horror overcome everything else. 

            Demond Mullins was an infantryman in Iraq and has been home for six months.  After returning home and struggling with guilt and regret, he found Iraq Veterans Against the War (IVAW) and quickly joined.  Demond, who is only a year older than I am, enlisted because he wanted to get the college benefits.  As we spoke, the idea that the cost of college for him is measured in blood struck hard.  Demond saw his best friend die in Iraq and wears a bracelet to commemorate him.  He wishes he stood up to the industrial-military complex, which he now speaks out against, and refused deployment:  “I still beat myself up over conforming,” he tells me.  “I should have resisted, made a statement.”  He calls the Bush administration “cowardly” and says that “’supporting our troops’ would be being out here right now.”  That Demond is only 22 is difficult to comprehend - in his voice and in his eyes you can tell that something has been taken away from him; there is a sadness and an anger, a year of his life lost to a cause he now realizes is wholly “immoral.”  He never received the college benefits that he was promised.

            After leaving Demond, I sought out someone from the “media staff,” who were there to help coordinate interviews for members of “The Press.”  One staff member asked me who I wanted to talk to.  I sheepishly replied, “Uh, Cindy Sheehan?” figuring that I’d aim high.  Within a few minutes, I was shaking her hand and setting up my recorder.  Soon after saying, “Hi, my name is Aaron Sussman, I’m from WESU,” I realized that I had nothing to ask her.  What can you ask someone who has been so widely covered by “The Press” and asked so many questions by so many people?  As much as I loved my Press Badge, I didn’t want to be journalist right then – I wanted to thank her for everything she has done for the cause of peace, tell her how moving it was to hear her talk about her son, commiserate with her about the desperation and fury and helplessness that so many feel.  I wanted the architects of the war and members of  Congress and everyone else complicit whose children will never see combat to feel the pain that she has felt, understand the consequences of what they are doing.  I simply asked her to say some words directed toward college students and then thanked her.  I shook her hand again, said thank you one more time, and left. 

I thought about the press conference earlier that day, about the stoic look on the faces of all the real, professional, important journalists.  I wondered what they’d write about in their stories.  I wondered what they would have said to a man who went through Hell to get an education or a woman whose son paid the ultimate price for a hollow cause.  I wondered about what made those journalists so real, so professional, and so important.  And then I wondered about why this tragic war is still going on, and why nothing seems to change.  


 

© 2004 Aaron Sussman. All rights reserved.

BACK